From A.R.BORDON & D.H.HASLER. Thing our of no thing. Light Encoding of Object Matrices and Manifest Production Observership in the Idiomaterial UNUM – A Technical Monograph. LPG-C Technical Essays & Monographs Vol 1 2009.
Material synchronization and desynchronization occurs in time but manifests as space perturbation in the form of matter. We now know and understand it comes through and from subquantum energy as time energetics, and how. There is desynchronization and synchronization of matter by technological means, and also by biological causal induction. We focus on the latter; it is what in the popular mind today is known as LERM, or more technically, LEOM (light-encoding of object matrices) and VEEOM. More on this later. In this monograph, we will also refer to it as matter synchronization.
The rest of this monograph is devoted to our presentation of the physics and biophysics of matter synchronization in the Unum, and more specifically in the Form-Design Continuum of the particulate/condensate region of the Unum – in which the universe as we know it is located – by a human being. In other words, we are proposing that a human COBE (complex oscillating biological entity) is capable of performing a feat of matter synchronization at room temperature and by biologic causal induction.
Let’s begin with destruction to know and understand how creation works.
Matter Desynchronization/synchronization
a. Desynchronization
Temporal matter desynchronization is a phenomenon that often goes unnoticed because it occurs when light in a material medium travels through it in a curved pathway, when the speed of light varies from the speed value in the vacuum. This effect ordinarily goes unnoticed. Large increases in the refractive index by electrical means produce large desynchronizations in inert matter. The rate of time passage inside the inert matter medium is retarded with respect to the rate of time passage outside the medium. In biological tissue, matter desynchronization is at the heart of the Priore effect. See other essays and monographs done by LPG-C members, part of the Idiomaterial Unum-Universe Series.
Inert matter desynchronized relative to the index medium could pass through matter in phase with the local reference frame, since the local reference matter is not crossed by the desynchronized matter at the same rate of time passage. A key factor in desynchronization is the presence of iron in desynchronizing matter. In experiments done by others known to us, iron plates were the metal of choice due to their magnetic properties. Larry Adams’ ideas on matter desynchronization were tested, quite successfully. In an earlier experiment, a hollow sample of large dimensions was used as suggested. The shell, separating inside from outside, was relatively thick. The index of refraction in metals can indeed be expressed as a function of the plasma frequency, Wp, and the applied frequency, W,
n^2 = 1 - (Wp / W )^2
In the experimental framework, N was a key measure, where the number of electrons was the electron density in the metal at crucial moments. N is directly proportional to the mass density. For constant mass, a decrease in density requires an increase in volume. A large increase in volume would significantly lower the plasma frequency, greatly increasing the transparency of the metal. The physical properties of a metal crystal are a function of the crystal structure itself. When an acoustic wave heats the crystal by compressing it, at certain temperatures, the crystalline structure of certain substances, including metals like iron, may change in lattice arrangement, and a sudden change of volume will occurs at constant temperature, making the coefficient of expansion momentarily infinity. If the volume were infinite, the iron would become transparent to all electromagnetic frequencies.
In an attempt in the summer of 2009 in Montana at replicating earlier work with iron, we saw iron become transparent to all EM frequencies, as predicted by Adams. For the iron to be transparent to frequencies from radar to optical ones the volume would be finite. Since the volume change is at the level of the crystal lattice, no macrophysical change in volume is expected, and none was measured. The main acoustooptic effect is the change of the optical index of refraction of the material under the influence of strain caused by the acoustic wave. As the pressure on a material changes, so does its density and therefore its index of refraction.
As previous work found, nonlinear equations of motion for the interacting spins are important for the large amplitude precessions induced by the intense microwave fields. We also saw these large amplitude precessions break up into acoustic vibrations, manifesting a magneto-acoustic resonance. This suggests the likelihood that ferromagnetic resonance, by way of an acoustical pathway, renders metallic iron transparent to frequencies of light in the radar to optical range. This conductor has seemingly become an insulator, since the conductivity also depends on the number—density.
b. Synchronization
In physical chemistry and certain physics quarters, the rich collective behavior, including mutual entrainment and self-synchronization, seen in systems of coupled oscillators has been a stimulus for the long-standing interest in these systems. With us in LPG-C, it was the mention of possibilities that biologic matter causal induction of matter desynchronization-synchronization was the case. Recently, attention turned to the study of coupled chaotic oscillators and, in particular, to the phenomenon of phase synchronization. Provided that the phase can be defined (28) (29), two coupled nonidentical chaotic oscillators are said to be phase synchronized if their frequencies are locked (30) (31). This appears to be a general phenomenon observed in such diverse systems as electrically coupled neurons, biomedical systems, chemical systems, and spatially extended ecological systems.
Much of the theoretical analyses of phase synchronization have been carried out on systems consisting of two locally coupled oscillators (31) or many globally coupled oscillators (32). Large one-dimensional chains of locally coupled chaotic oscillators have been investigated very recently (33), (34), (35). Jorn Davidsen and Raymond Kapral (36) address the question whether phase synchronization can persist in higher spatial dimensions where topological defects can play a central role. They also show that the existence of topological defects can lead to a breakdown of global phase synchronization in two-dimensional arrays of nonidentical chaotic oscillators, with interesting effects.The significance to us of the work done by the Toronto investigators is that the existence of topological defects can lead to a breakdown of global phase synchronization in two-dimensional arrays of nonidentical chaotic oscillators. While most of the medium may remain phase synchronized, oscillators close to moving topological defects have a different frequency. Despite this fact, the phase coherence of the system is higher than in systems without topological defects. Davidsen and Kapral performed a simulation of transition to phase synchronization in 1-dimensional space, and this produced phase clustering, but when the same was attempted in 2-dimensional space, the transition involved point defects and was not complete, but rather only partial.
c. Synchronization in 3-dimensional space regimes
It is now clear to us that the vacuum is source to all matter. Essential to us is observership - the presence of observers and the process of observation (or perspective of perceptual interface and interaction with a process, an object, a hypersurface, or any other element included in the statevector). What is observership includes six classes of process, three classes of objects, and two classes of observer design configuration. Process classes include biosimplex unit interface, biosimplex overfunction interface, biocomplex unit interface, biocomplex overfunction interface, complex unit ontoenergetic interface, and complex overfunction ontoenergetic interface. The object classes include form-based ontobioenergetic entities, form-based ontocyborenergetic entities, and formless ontoenergetic entities. And the two classes of observer design configuration are mass-form design configuration and massless design configuration. Human beings are but one subclass of biocomplex unit interface capable ontobioenergetic entity with a mass-form design configuration. So what is reality for these observers? What reality do they observe? Is the reality observed by one of one class the same as that observed by another from the same class and from another class? Is the reality of these observers shared, participatory and unitive? How is reality formed? Is reality the statevector itself? Does observation = experience = interface = manifest production observership (MPO) of a hologram-like reality?7 In other words, how is matter synchronized in 4-spacetime reality in the presence of observership in a given locality? And what is a human observer’s interaction frame with the subquantum to be able to synchronize matter at will?
The empirical evidence in our two labs and by people we have shown how to achieve matter synchronization on demand is overwhelming: it is not only possible, it is inevitable. In the next decade, we should be seeing replications made of it in other labs around the world. In this monograph, between here and the last part, we are going to have a closer look at the physics and biophysics of sonobioelectronic and sonobioelectrogravitic nature of living tissue matter on Earth, and at the biogeosystemics of vacuum-plenum information subquantum bio-information dynamics. And then, in the last part of this monograph, we are going to discuss the algorithmic nature of the process that makes matter synchronization on demand (MSOD) possible, how a human being makes it happen, and a model of how it could happen – even though there is still much we don’t yet fully understand.
For posts of ongoing discussions, also see http://lerm-mpo.wetpaint.com/thread/3770720/This+is+OLD+stuff.+Things+have+gotten+much+weirder.
Sunday, April 4, 2010
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC L.E.O.M. ALGORITHM
FROM: A.R. Bordon. The psychophysiologic LEOM algorithm. LIFE PHYSICS GROUP – CALIFORNIA. First Edition May 14, 2001. Second Edition February 21, 2010.
There is a “formula” that leads our single degree of freedom overunity sink biomind awareness, using psychophysiologies to produce a “thing” (or 4-spacetime object) out of no-thing (or its subquantum templaic conformation). This formula is an algorithm or, as we described elsewhere (1), “a certain sort of formal process that can be counted on-logically-to yield a certain sort of result whenever it is ‘run’ or instantiated.” Also see Daniel C. Dennett (“Darwin’s Dangerous Idea”, Simon & Schuster, 1995, pp. 50-51) (2). We also said (a) an algorithm has substrate neutrality, (b) an underlying mindlessness, and (c) guaranteed results.
The substrate or basic neutrality of an algorithm allows you to use the underlying procedure on anything it can be applied to, using any logical system you want. The power of the procedure is due to its logical structure, not just the causal powers of the materials used in the instantiation, just so long as those causal powers permit the prescribed steps to be followed exactly
The mindlessness of the prescribed steps is what makes the algorithm logical, because the logic of the steps and their sequencing are simple. An algorithm worked out by you for you will not necessarily work for me or for your mate, or for Jaime, or for anyone else. The KEY here is that algorithms are as personal as the imprints on your iris or the patterns on your fingerprints. What is presented here is a process you need to translate to your body and biomind, and the unexpected experience will be (albeit new to you) exhilarating to your biomind, for it gets to awaken or “express” a function already inscribed in your DNA, and this your biomind knows deeply. There is a general process which a user then must devise as an internal, repeatable procedure. Your biomind already know and knows it well. In a manner of speaking, it knows better than the ego-personality you think is you. There is one key thought to be understood from the outset, and it is simply this: you are a biomind, where the mind sets the course and the body follows. The “sequence” presented and described here will be given in as generic a language set as possible, for your interpretation of what is written is THE most crucial aspect of this endeavor. As first impressions are lasting, so are first imprints (or interpretations given by the mind for processes and procedures it wishes the body to comply and perform). It is here that we can help with, for in writing this chapter, we had to revisit our first times and the “newbie” moments of others who have already performed MPO-LEOM feats.
REPLICATION
Can you imagine now a real Star Trek-type replicator capable of replicating a nice fish dish, or a delicious apple pie, or a turkey and cheese sandwich on rye bread? We are sure you can, but are we asking the right question on this matter? Perhaps not. If a replicator is possible, what does it mean in terms of creating objects out of thin air? Is the object replicated a duplication, imitation, copy, or reproduction? Is the object you wish to light-encode its matrix as product a replication, duplication, imitation of another, copy, or reproduction?
First, let’s state the obvious, and then explore the quantum meaning of things. It means that an object in spacetime has a quantum potential template or subquantum regimens, and both the object and the quantum template are information sets that can be grasped, captured, and stored in a suitable medium. This also means the replicator must have quantum computing capabilities and the ability to read and recognize the quantum numbers of any macro-quantum object. What, really, are these quantum numbers denoting and describing? What aspect of the object – a cell phone, an apple, money – are described by the quantum numbers? They are denoting and describing the macro-quantum object itself. We will explain that further below. Human beings, in their Meissner fields and living matrices, already have quantum computing capabilities inscribed and mostly latent.
In the case of us human complex oscillating biological entities (or COBEs), we have Meissner-antiMeissner nonionizing fields surrounding our bodies at 90 degrees perpendicular and away from the surfaces of the body, and these fields within fields function as our memory and information processing capacities well beyond our cortical awareness. Animals and plants also have Meissner-antiMeissner fields but do not appear to have the capacity to extend antiMeissner harmonics. Non ionizing fields emitted by the living matrices of any living system on Earth would qualify as Meissner range fields, as their electromagnetic range lies within the extremely low frequencies (ELF) of 1 Hz and 1560 Hz, though mostly from 1 Hz to 120 Hz.
However, simply because the human Meissner field expressions are low-powered cellular maxima of approximately 1.2 volts per cell, the total possible output of a human being as overunity sink is about one quadrillion volts, taking into consideration the total cellular capacitance of the body. And this capacitance level is sufficient to MPO one’s reality or LEOM most anything we want.
Each target is also a quantum macro-object, with a geometric form in 4-spacetime and a fuzzy form (with a geometry of its own) in the subquantum. As you LEOM an MPOed object, the visualization of the target object is of the actual, physical object. However, the overunity sink (i.e., the enteric brain complex in the ventral area and the thoracic cavity of the human body) is aimed at the subquantum potential templaic conformation of the 4-dimensional object. The moment visual vector-intention is locked on the target object in 4-spacetime (an actual physical object to be replicated or an internal visual target), the subquantum potential templaic lock occurs automatically. You don’t have to do anything consciously for this to happen; one’s enteric complex, indeed, one’s entire cellular make up, performs that function for you beyond normal awareness. Replication, in this instance, and by the use of this procedure as algorithmic arrangement, is light-encoding by the “mirror-action” of one template (subquantum potential) so that the other (4-spacetime) template can manifest as macro-quantum object. Let’s examine an example, and this may help you understand this seeming “dance” of one template with the other in a kind of Texas two-step.
Take a look at the picture on the right (in the essay, there is a picture not reporduced here). This is a graphic representation of a fuzzy boundary geometrized subquantum potential-template of an orange. A way of understanding this graphic representation (which is not identical or isomorphic to what neurosensors “see” when they look at the quantum-potential templaic conformation of a 4-dimensional orange) is to think of the templaic conformation as having infinite “dimensions” –dimensions of space and time in the angular momenta of all potential subparticles that are not matter yet, in a ratio of space/time that makes possible and easy the light-encoding of this conformation and manifesting it as the fruit we know as orange. So when you think hologramically about the orange you visualize in your mind as 4-dimensional, do you have to worry about the quantum-potential templaic conformation of the orange? No, you don’t. But you need to obey one rule of all holomovement in the Unum: the Texas two-step has to be danced backward; that is, you start out allowing your MPO to light-encode the reality-orange at its thought-matrix from its physical (or 4-dimensional) center outward. Every LEOM moment filmed shows this unique pattern of manifestation. It doesn’t matter where in the world you are, the same thing happens – from the inside to the outside. This is an important piece of information. Remember it.
Throughout the LEOMing process, the encoding of light energy is very much as if an invisible quantum computer were “writing” the object into existence. We say “invisible” because so far we don’t quite understand how the computing capacities of the human biomind enteric complex works. We know it does, and does very well. Moreover, this invisible quantum computer is the subquantum negative of the positive image in your mind or of the object desired. And the computer is very much like a glove of the object superposed upon the object at a “relative distance” of some 720 degrees away from the spacetime occupied by the object itself or the “spacetime address” you wish to put the LEOMed object in.
Quantum numbers describe the electron energies in the atoms of an object. The question of how many quantum numbers are needed to describe any given object has no consistent and universal answer, because for each target object our enteromyofascial/Meissner field complex as “quantum biocomputer” must find the answer for a full analysis of the object’s system. So, in 1930, French mathematician Paul Dirac developed a new version of the Schrödinger Wave Equation which was relativistically invariant, and predicted the magnetic moment correctly, and at the same time treated the electron as a point particle. In the Dirac equation all four quantum numbers including the additional quantum number s arose naturally during its solution. And all of these calculations are performed by the biomind for every atom to be collocated as light-encoded atomic matter in the object’s quantum-potential/4-spacetime mirror-matrices!
MORE MAGIC: BIOGENETIC BASIS OF LEOM-MPO OR THE BIOMIND MINDING THE BODY
Interesting also that DNA plays an important, some would say crucial, role in the LEOM of an object or the MPO of a personal reality. This is not just human DNA affecting cells of one’s body, but also language affecting DNA itself. Moreover, our decipherment of DNA/environment interaction from what is predicted by the Working Model (see Foundation Reports in Life Physics, Vol 1, No. 1 essays) indicates that information bandwidths (electromagnetic ionizing, EM nonionizing, sound, electroluminescent) play a role in DNA expression, modifications, and retrofitting. Imagine this: take the information bandwidth of the fertilized gamete of a rat and transmit that to the fertilized gamete of a gerbil and what do you get as a result? A rat born to a gerbil. This has been done in our labs and also done in Russia a few years ago. We also found that just about everything has a ”languaging system” unique to itself: DNA responds to sound and to EM (ionizing and nonionizing) and scalar (or beyond the EM) energetics. You can literally talk to your cells and change their DNA. You can also talk to the cells of another person and change them, too. It is all in the frequency ranges you use to communicate not just meaning, but also sound. Do your cells understand words themselves and the sound you use in uttering them? Better than you and in all of their denotations and connotations.
The important biogenetic basis of LEOM-MPO from the biomind minding the body is what the cytogenetic (cellular/genetic) aspect of the biomind’s living matrix literally creates around the body-form: a nonionizing high energetic domain that, when measured with certain instruments, tells us this (Meissner) field is really a vacuum or plasma-like domain. Can we extend ourselves onto a rock or a mountain and “exist” there for a while in a kind of extension-visit while keyed to our physical body? Yes. And this is the basis of extension neurosensing. How far can we “go” on these extension “tours”? By our calculations, it seems we are capable of extending some 30 billion light years without breaking a sweat. This, by the way, gives new meaning to the saying, “the universe in a grain of sand, and the whole of creation in a thought.” But that’s not all; what is said is only in our known universe. Actually, we can now go to the T-boundary – the source of everything itself. See the LPG-C website for more information, at http://www.lifephysicsgroup.org/index.html.
There is a “formula” that leads our single degree of freedom overunity sink biomind awareness, using psychophysiologies to produce a “thing” (or 4-spacetime object) out of no-thing (or its subquantum templaic conformation). This formula is an algorithm or, as we described elsewhere (1), “a certain sort of formal process that can be counted on-logically-to yield a certain sort of result whenever it is ‘run’ or instantiated.” Also see Daniel C. Dennett (“Darwin’s Dangerous Idea”, Simon & Schuster, 1995, pp. 50-51) (2). We also said (a) an algorithm has substrate neutrality, (b) an underlying mindlessness, and (c) guaranteed results.
The substrate or basic neutrality of an algorithm allows you to use the underlying procedure on anything it can be applied to, using any logical system you want. The power of the procedure is due to its logical structure, not just the causal powers of the materials used in the instantiation, just so long as those causal powers permit the prescribed steps to be followed exactly
The mindlessness of the prescribed steps is what makes the algorithm logical, because the logic of the steps and their sequencing are simple. An algorithm worked out by you for you will not necessarily work for me or for your mate, or for Jaime, or for anyone else. The KEY here is that algorithms are as personal as the imprints on your iris or the patterns on your fingerprints. What is presented here is a process you need to translate to your body and biomind, and the unexpected experience will be (albeit new to you) exhilarating to your biomind, for it gets to awaken or “express” a function already inscribed in your DNA, and this your biomind knows deeply. There is a general process which a user then must devise as an internal, repeatable procedure. Your biomind already know and knows it well. In a manner of speaking, it knows better than the ego-personality you think is you. There is one key thought to be understood from the outset, and it is simply this: you are a biomind, where the mind sets the course and the body follows. The “sequence” presented and described here will be given in as generic a language set as possible, for your interpretation of what is written is THE most crucial aspect of this endeavor. As first impressions are lasting, so are first imprints (or interpretations given by the mind for processes and procedures it wishes the body to comply and perform). It is here that we can help with, for in writing this chapter, we had to revisit our first times and the “newbie” moments of others who have already performed MPO-LEOM feats.
REPLICATION
Can you imagine now a real Star Trek-type replicator capable of replicating a nice fish dish, or a delicious apple pie, or a turkey and cheese sandwich on rye bread? We are sure you can, but are we asking the right question on this matter? Perhaps not. If a replicator is possible, what does it mean in terms of creating objects out of thin air? Is the object replicated a duplication, imitation, copy, or reproduction? Is the object you wish to light-encode its matrix as product a replication, duplication, imitation of another, copy, or reproduction?
First, let’s state the obvious, and then explore the quantum meaning of things. It means that an object in spacetime has a quantum potential template or subquantum regimens, and both the object and the quantum template are information sets that can be grasped, captured, and stored in a suitable medium. This also means the replicator must have quantum computing capabilities and the ability to read and recognize the quantum numbers of any macro-quantum object. What, really, are these quantum numbers denoting and describing? What aspect of the object – a cell phone, an apple, money – are described by the quantum numbers? They are denoting and describing the macro-quantum object itself. We will explain that further below. Human beings, in their Meissner fields and living matrices, already have quantum computing capabilities inscribed and mostly latent.
In the case of us human complex oscillating biological entities (or COBEs), we have Meissner-antiMeissner nonionizing fields surrounding our bodies at 90 degrees perpendicular and away from the surfaces of the body, and these fields within fields function as our memory and information processing capacities well beyond our cortical awareness. Animals and plants also have Meissner-antiMeissner fields but do not appear to have the capacity to extend antiMeissner harmonics. Non ionizing fields emitted by the living matrices of any living system on Earth would qualify as Meissner range fields, as their electromagnetic range lies within the extremely low frequencies (ELF) of 1 Hz and 1560 Hz, though mostly from 1 Hz to 120 Hz.
However, simply because the human Meissner field expressions are low-powered cellular maxima of approximately 1.2 volts per cell, the total possible output of a human being as overunity sink is about one quadrillion volts, taking into consideration the total cellular capacitance of the body. And this capacitance level is sufficient to MPO one’s reality or LEOM most anything we want.
Each target is also a quantum macro-object, with a geometric form in 4-spacetime and a fuzzy form (with a geometry of its own) in the subquantum. As you LEOM an MPOed object, the visualization of the target object is of the actual, physical object. However, the overunity sink (i.e., the enteric brain complex in the ventral area and the thoracic cavity of the human body) is aimed at the subquantum potential templaic conformation of the 4-dimensional object. The moment visual vector-intention is locked on the target object in 4-spacetime (an actual physical object to be replicated or an internal visual target), the subquantum potential templaic lock occurs automatically. You don’t have to do anything consciously for this to happen; one’s enteric complex, indeed, one’s entire cellular make up, performs that function for you beyond normal awareness. Replication, in this instance, and by the use of this procedure as algorithmic arrangement, is light-encoding by the “mirror-action” of one template (subquantum potential) so that the other (4-spacetime) template can manifest as macro-quantum object. Let’s examine an example, and this may help you understand this seeming “dance” of one template with the other in a kind of Texas two-step.
Take a look at the picture on the right (in the essay, there is a picture not reporduced here). This is a graphic representation of a fuzzy boundary geometrized subquantum potential-template of an orange. A way of understanding this graphic representation (which is not identical or isomorphic to what neurosensors “see” when they look at the quantum-potential templaic conformation of a 4-dimensional orange) is to think of the templaic conformation as having infinite “dimensions” –dimensions of space and time in the angular momenta of all potential subparticles that are not matter yet, in a ratio of space/time that makes possible and easy the light-encoding of this conformation and manifesting it as the fruit we know as orange. So when you think hologramically about the orange you visualize in your mind as 4-dimensional, do you have to worry about the quantum-potential templaic conformation of the orange? No, you don’t. But you need to obey one rule of all holomovement in the Unum: the Texas two-step has to be danced backward; that is, you start out allowing your MPO to light-encode the reality-orange at its thought-matrix from its physical (or 4-dimensional) center outward. Every LEOM moment filmed shows this unique pattern of manifestation. It doesn’t matter where in the world you are, the same thing happens – from the inside to the outside. This is an important piece of information. Remember it.
Throughout the LEOMing process, the encoding of light energy is very much as if an invisible quantum computer were “writing” the object into existence. We say “invisible” because so far we don’t quite understand how the computing capacities of the human biomind enteric complex works. We know it does, and does very well. Moreover, this invisible quantum computer is the subquantum negative of the positive image in your mind or of the object desired. And the computer is very much like a glove of the object superposed upon the object at a “relative distance” of some 720 degrees away from the spacetime occupied by the object itself or the “spacetime address” you wish to put the LEOMed object in.
Quantum numbers describe the electron energies in the atoms of an object. The question of how many quantum numbers are needed to describe any given object has no consistent and universal answer, because for each target object our enteromyofascial/Meissner field complex as “quantum biocomputer” must find the answer for a full analysis of the object’s system. So, in 1930, French mathematician Paul Dirac developed a new version of the Schrödinger Wave Equation which was relativistically invariant, and predicted the magnetic moment correctly, and at the same time treated the electron as a point particle. In the Dirac equation all four quantum numbers including the additional quantum number s arose naturally during its solution. And all of these calculations are performed by the biomind for every atom to be collocated as light-encoded atomic matter in the object’s quantum-potential/4-spacetime mirror-matrices!
MORE MAGIC: BIOGENETIC BASIS OF LEOM-MPO OR THE BIOMIND MINDING THE BODY
Interesting also that DNA plays an important, some would say crucial, role in the LEOM of an object or the MPO of a personal reality. This is not just human DNA affecting cells of one’s body, but also language affecting DNA itself. Moreover, our decipherment of DNA/environment interaction from what is predicted by the Working Model (see Foundation Reports in Life Physics, Vol 1, No. 1 essays) indicates that information bandwidths (electromagnetic ionizing, EM nonionizing, sound, electroluminescent) play a role in DNA expression, modifications, and retrofitting. Imagine this: take the information bandwidth of the fertilized gamete of a rat and transmit that to the fertilized gamete of a gerbil and what do you get as a result? A rat born to a gerbil. This has been done in our labs and also done in Russia a few years ago. We also found that just about everything has a ”languaging system” unique to itself: DNA responds to sound and to EM (ionizing and nonionizing) and scalar (or beyond the EM) energetics. You can literally talk to your cells and change their DNA. You can also talk to the cells of another person and change them, too. It is all in the frequency ranges you use to communicate not just meaning, but also sound. Do your cells understand words themselves and the sound you use in uttering them? Better than you and in all of their denotations and connotations.
The important biogenetic basis of LEOM-MPO from the biomind minding the body is what the cytogenetic (cellular/genetic) aspect of the biomind’s living matrix literally creates around the body-form: a nonionizing high energetic domain that, when measured with certain instruments, tells us this (Meissner) field is really a vacuum or plasma-like domain. Can we extend ourselves onto a rock or a mountain and “exist” there for a while in a kind of extension-visit while keyed to our physical body? Yes. And this is the basis of extension neurosensing. How far can we “go” on these extension “tours”? By our calculations, it seems we are capable of extending some 30 billion light years without breaking a sweat. This, by the way, gives new meaning to the saying, “the universe in a grain of sand, and the whole of creation in a thought.” But that’s not all; what is said is only in our known universe. Actually, we can now go to the T-boundary – the source of everything itself. See the LPG-C website for more information, at http://www.lifephysicsgroup.org/index.html.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)